Rethinking Philanthropy
In recent years, two key levers for societal change and response to the meta-crisis have grown in size and visibility – civil society and the philanthropic sector. Most NGOs cannot, by design, affect deep systems change beyond ushering in incremental reforms as they are dependent upon and largely part of the neoliberal machinery through their sources of funding, job dependence, and often their ideology.
While the ever growing philanthropic sector has huge independence, considerable influence, and the possibility to fund new ecosystems of change, it too is not yet providing a timely, commensurate response to the meta-crisis.
Much of philanthropy is still deeply woven in the fabric of the old paradigm of growth-based capitalism. Rather than fundamentally changing the rules of the operating system, too often the aim is more “inclusion” into an unsustainable, exponential growth system. Many foundations are mired in beliefs, behaviors, and an institutional culture that hinders them and their partners to truly catalyze systemic change.
For example, philanthropy often promulgates (and fixates on) overly linear, two-dimensional metrics that belie the complex, non-linear reality of change. Too often the individuals and the organizations they work within cannot adequately deal with visible and invisible power structures and inherent biases, further exacerbating and perpetuating the inequities and crises the sector seeks to influence. In short, philanthropy and NGOs are caught in and reinforce a profound contradiction. They continue to hold promise and the potential to create new systems, yet they cannot do so while they benefit and perpetuate existing structures.